![]() ![]() The rig deck and associated equipment can crank itself up and down the huge vertical frame towers to accommodate varying. You have to retopologize the model, which is basically simplifying your polygons with the right topology flow for rigging. Need to figure out how to take the location of complicated models on site & represent the location in side plant - currently the location can be set by the imported xref.Ĭollision checking then performed in Navisworks. cgtrader The self contained jack-up rig is positioned onto site by lowering and rooting their three or four giant legs on the sea floor. Currently the plant dwg is big - looks good in Navisworks but sluggish inside plant. From a more technical point of view, the originality of the approach lies in (1) the choice of metamodelling only the most time-consuming part of the model (i.e. Presume the revit/inventor models are sent to Navisworks & the Plant Model sent to navis too, thinking about how the co ordinate systems are all tied together. Are imported models best avoided because of the performance hit? this looks like a way to keep everything a simple as possible. The tutorials I've seen appear to point to creating models from scratch using the tools within plant. ![]() With Inventor a sketch plane can be used & geometry projected & extruded - not sure how to keep the same co-ordinate system trying to copy the workflow in Autocad. Models imported from Inventor & Navisworks can be sizable - currently theses models are xrefs but when switched on performance is slow.Īny top tips for creating simple representations of imported model for plant 3d ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |